Multi-site enrollment visibility without the spreadsheet chase
When you are managing 15 sites on a single protocol, the enrollment picture exists in 15 separate pre-screen logs. Enrollvue consolidates that into a single protocol-level view your CRAs can act on, without asking sites to change how they work.
The coordination cost CROs know too well
CRAs calling sites weekly for pre-screen counts. Site managers sending pre-screen logs in different formats, on different schedules. Clinical operations staff rebuilding the picture from partial data every Monday morning. The information exists at the sites, but by the time it reaches the protocol team it is already a week old.
Enrollvue does not replace your CRA oversight model. It gives CRAs better information to work with: which sites have queried their EHR this week, which have a healthy candidate pipeline, and which are behind pace for first patient in. Enrollvue reads what sites produce; it does not ask sites to produce anything differently.
We do not manage your trial. We do not replace your clinical operations team's judgment on site support strategy. We give that team the enrollment signal it currently has to reconstruct manually.
What CROs use Enrollvue for
Protocol-level rollup
Aggregate eligible candidates across all active sites. See your total pre-screening pipeline for a protocol in one place, updated as sites run queries, without assembling it from individual site reports.
Site-level comparison
See which sites are producing candidates and which have low screening activity relative to their patient population size. Direct CRA support to the sites where it will move the enrollment needle before the protocol hits a milestone date.
Pre-screening SLA tracking
Track time from EHR query initiation to coordinator review completion, per site. Identify sites where the pre-screening cycle is stalling so you can intervene before the delay reaches your FPI milestone.
Sponsor reporting export
Export pre-screening pipeline data in sponsor-ready format: screened, eligible, enrolled, and ineligible counts by site and protocol. Less time reformatting data; more time spent on the analysis your sponsor is actually asking for.